4 May
2010
4 May
'10
10:13 a.m.
On Tue, 4 May 2010 12:39:33 +0300, Roman Kyrylych <roman.kyrylych@gmail.com> wrote:
I fail to see why resyncs are not needed in this situation. Let's suppose we have /foo/bar on a downstream mirror, and upstream has /foo/bar -> /baz/bar will rsync guess that it should not download bar and instead just copy it from foo to baz locally?
It's the other way round we keep the old dirs; so packages will be replaced by symlinks to the packages dir when they got updated. -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre