On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Jan de Groot<jan@jgc.homeip.net> wrote:
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 14:33 -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Pierre Schmitz<pierre@archlinux.de> wrote:
Am Montag 10 August 2009 21:04:10 schrieb Tobias Powalowski:
Due to the slicehost issue, shall we wait until they react on this? I'm don't like to depend on others for our package upgrades. Any other opinions?
We cannot wait for every single provider to catch up; so why do this with this one here? We don't support keeping old versions of packages while updating all others; and that's what we have here in the end.
I agree with Pierre here. Even though I do have a slice, management of that slice is _my_ job. I've already attempted (and failed) the upgrade, so am aware of the problem. Adding udev to IgnorePkg isn't too hard, and that's kinda what it's made for
The new udev will be a dependency for things like devicekit-power and devicekit-disks, but since those are things for the desktop stack, I don't see reason to have it on a slicehost server.
BTW: Did anyone actually try to run this version of udev on an older kernel?
Yeah, I tried it on my slice and it failed miserably. Posted this in another thread about this: (signalfd man page has sample code) agriffin@snarf:~$ man signalfd agriffin@snarf:~$ vim signalfd_demo.c agriffin@snarf:~$ gcc signalfd_demo.c -o signalfd_demo agriffin@snarf:~$ ./signalfd_demo signalfd: Function not implemented agriffin@snarf:~$ uname -a Linux snarf 2.6.24-24-xen #1 SMP Tue Jun 30 21:53:02 UTC 2009 x86_64 Dual-Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 2212 HE AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux