On Tue, 2021-03-02 at 00:19 +0100, Levente Polyak via arch-dev-public wrote:
I think this is a great step for our distro to get a nicely pre shaped proposals before hitting the final review and presentation phase as well as a central point for storing those. I think its pretty tough for fresh staff to find discussions, reasoning and details around a certain topic or formulation and this is a great step of address this. Same feeling.
Nevertheless after reading the final text, it's still unclear to me how the proposals are stamped accepted or rejected and by how many of us? Even accepted, what does that means? We currently have several groups, with different decision-making systems and dynamics. For example, developers use (some sort of) consensus, the TUs majority, etc. Is each group decide if they will apply them with there voting system? Like companies with real RFC (e.g DANE). Is a larger group could use this to push changes in another? Regards, PS: We should pick an acronym like ARFC instead of RFC which is implicit reference to IETF RFC. -- Sébastien "Seblu" Luttringer