On 1/28/25 1:45 PM, kpcyrd wrote:
On 1/28/25 12:59 AM, Robin Candau wrote:
Anyway, sorry for the long read 0:) Just to clarify, the actual purpose of this mail is to collect thoughts, concerns, questions, interests (both regarding using such an "official" Arch Linux WSL image and / or helping maintaining it), ... Please, share opinions if you have some :)
I'd also be fine with this. I had a really bad experience with WSL1 because of the number of bogus bug reports I got, but since WSL2 things seem better.
Hey :) Thanks for sharing thoughts. Indeed WSL2 is a massive improvement compared to WSL1. Again, just to make things clear for everyone, WSL1 is out of the scope of this proposal. I'm only targeting support for WSL2.
Arch Linux has a very extensive collection of software, I think it's incredibly useful, even on non-Arch Linux computers.
I think so too.
I think considering WSL related bug reports as low priority is very acceptable, and treat it more like a best-effort project instead of blocking it outright.
I would be fine with this as well.
cheers, kpcyrd
-- Regards, Robin Candau / Antiz