Re: [arch-dev-public] why?

On 7/19/07, Damir Perisa <damir.perisa@solnet.ch> wrote:

* why renaming the current repo? current and extra make perfectly sense in the KISS approach to me.

My biggest problem is grammar. "current" and "extra" don't follow each other. "less" and "more", "east" and "west", "monday" and "saturday" - all these words are related in some way. "current" and "extra" don't make any sense? If "current" is current, does that mean extra is not current? Is current more up to date than current? "extra" what? More extra than "current"? Does that mean it's from the future?