3 Mar
2021
3 Mar
'21
10:36 p.m.
On 4/3/21 8:13 am, Evangelos Foutras wrote:
On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 at 23:34, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public <arch-dev-public@lists.archlinux.org> wrote:
Options realistically are:
1) bump the baseline 2) provide a second more optimized port.
3) defer this until better tooling is available to implement (2)
Since the RFC is about bumping -march to x86_64-v2, it either gets accepted and my desktop computer can no longer run Arch, or the RFC gets rejected and another approach is proposed in the future. Discussing alternative implementations seems out of scope.
This is the discussion period to shape the RFC into a form that is acceptable. If (1) is not acceptable, it can transition to (2) if people want that approach. Allan