Re: Official Arch Linux image for WSL

Hi, George!

If I remember correctly, this was suggested before and shot down because WSL is its own can of beans, and mainly because having this “official” implies that we will “support” this in the way of bug reports etc etc.

My feelings remain the same, I have zero interest in spending time on any WSL related issues.

In principle, I do agree: I prefer cygwin over WSL for exactly the same "can-of-beans" reason. But, if someone is brave enough - why not? Ok, "one" is not really reliable - there must be at least two of them:) I.e. to my understanding this topic boils down to "do we have enough volunteers for that?"