Sunday 04 November 2007, Jan de Groot wrote: | On Sun, 2007-11-04 at 12:02 +0100, Damir Perisa wrote: | > seems we have a polarisation here... some are against it, some | > are for it. | > | > can you guys who think we should add this patch please tell me | > the reason why it cannot be a fork-package of initscripts but | > has to be integrated? | | Initscripts is an important package. Making users install an | unofficial initscripts package will give us extra bugreports. I've | seen it with all those pesky "XDG_DATA_DIRS is not set" bugreports | because Alex decided to move xorg.sh from xproto to libx11 while | many users didn't use the official libx11, but a libx11-xcb | package. i mean having an official initscripts-flash. one that would take the initscripts as source, apply the patch and be the one used. provided by a dev who likes flash :) - D -- .·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´ ° ° ° ° ° ° ><((((º> ° ° ° ° ° <º)))>< <º)))><