2007/9/13, Tobias Powalowski <t.powa@gmx.de>:
Am Mittwoch 12 September 2007 schrieb Jason Chu:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 04:42:51PM -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote:
On 9/12/07, Tobias Powalowski <t.powa@gmx.de> wrote:
Im pretty sure Jan(is a little bit busy) and me will be there too
I don't have plans this weekend, but of course, I'm on a different schedule than the germans.
Ze Germans!
I'm sure I can do some of the work, just let me know what time you plan on starting, and I can figure out what works best for me.
I think tpowa is on the right track here - even if we don't get everything, we don't cover 100% of the packages, we can get MOST of it. We may forget one or two - big deal, we can add them later.
Thanks for picking this up again, this is one of the (many) important infrastructure things that have gone by the wayside.
I'm still worried about the three different versions of the packages. Can someone give me some numbers about untagged changes or differences between arch64 and arch32?
Jason
http://archlinux.org/~andyrtr/pkg_diff.html i would say the red ones could be troublemakers the rest should be fine
There should be some untagged packages with done bugfixes in them. In any case we shouldn't lose those untagged changes, as it will be a PITA to find and fix them later again. Doesn't CVS has some possibility to move untagged changes? -- Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич)