Tuesday 16 October 2007, Jason Chu wrote: | On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 10:48:25AM +0200, Damir Perisa wrote: | > Tuesday 16 October 2007, Dan McGee wrote: | > | On 10/15/07, Damir Perisa <damir.perisa@solnet.ch> wrote: | > | > Monday 15 October 2007, Simo Leone wrote: | > | > | Quick comment. We have lots of graphic artsy type people | > | > | in the community. Like the guy that started the new logo | > | > | thread on the bbs, he appears to possibly work in the | > | > | field and knows what he's doing. | > | > | | > | > | It's probably best to let the contest just be whatever, | > | > | even bad artists/non-pros may have some great ideas. But | > | > | in the end we should let someone who knows what they're | > | > | doing polish it up and stuff. | > | > | > | > i have slight experience in public relations and corporate | > | > identity things... but not as a professional. | > | > | > | > the problem is that with this, you actually degrade the | > | > original author and just take his/her idea to the pro to | > | > polish it up. hmm... who is then the author of the final | > | > product? | > | | > | If we are an open source software distro, then surely we can | > | have a strings-free logo as well. Its not that the original | > | design is bad and that the original author can't help do the | > | rest of the renditions, but surely we should honor | > | submissions from anyone that looks to improve the winning | > | logo into something that we can use across the board. | > | | > | -Dan | > | > i know ... but tell this author that his work is not good enough | > and that somebody else has to change it for us to be. | | I'm not worried about this. | | -1 ah ok fine by me then - D -- .·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´ ° ° ° ° ° ° ><((((º> ° ° ° ° ° <º)))>< <º)))><