On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 1:49 PM, Jason Chu <jason@archlinux.org> wrote:
On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 12:54:44PM -0400, Travis Willard wrote:
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 11:54 AM, eliott <eliott@cactuswax.net> wrote:
On 4/3/08, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 4:22 PM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
So, what do I need from you? Nothing. I'm making this easy in that I will do all the work. I just need one thing: give me a day when it is best. When you all want to take a mini-vacation and do no packaging at all. If no one has a good day for this, I will probably do it on Thursday or Friday.
Ok, so. I need to fly out for a business trip tonight (anyone in Vegas today and tomorrow?). I was hoping to actually do this today, but that fell through. I will be back on Saturday, so I plan on doing this then, starting about 10am CST on Saturday.
One request: Could you guys take a peek at the web-based viewers out there and let me know what you'd prefer? Items of interest: http://www.bluestatic.org/software/viewsvn/ http://www.viewvc.org/ http://websvn.tigris.org/ http://trac.edgewall.org/
I don't think trac would be a good fit, as it does wiki and bugtracking too.
I really haven't ever used anything other than ViewVC so I don't have a good basis for comparison.
However, this brings up an interesting (if somewhat offtopic, sorry) point - if we used Trac, could we integrate our package bugtracking directly with our repo, so that the issue could associate itself with the package in SVN? Would that even be useful? There was talk about how flyspray sucked recently, IIRC, so this could be an integrated replacement.
In general I'm not happy with Trac's wiki and bug tracker. Trac took all the simplest stuff and put it together so none of it is really good, it's just combined.
Fair enough - glad to hear from someone with experience in the matter. I was just throwing it out there as a possibility. :)