Travis Willard wrote:
On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 18:05:52 -0400 "Dan McGee" <dpmcgee@gmail.com> wrote:
Patch should fail on a file-by-file basis, so it shouldn't be all that bad of a result. And just make sure you check the diff before you commit.
-Dan
Well, I made use of the patch in unstable, and finished off all packages in that repo tonight. In fact, I even cleaned out some files that were no longer necessary on top of everything.
So, current status:
[extra] rougly 1100 invalid or missing licenses found by my script [community] rougly 430 invalid or missing licenses [unstable] complete - no invalid or missing licenses
Script attached to the email again if anyone wants to use it. I'm finding it particularily handy - and I updated it to check for custom licenses where the PKGBUILD doesn't reference usr/share/licenses - should weed out some incorrect custom licenses too.
-- Travis
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ arch-dev-public mailing list arch-dev-public@archlinux.org http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-dev-public I've dropped the patch into a git repository
current: http://neptune-one.homeip.net/git?p=abs/current;a=summary extra: http://neptune-one.homeip.net/git?p=abs/extra;a=summary There's 3 branches licenses: license field clean up makepkg_options: change no* to !* ... etc sourceforge: change all sf download urls to downloads.sf.net Andrew