Hi, @Fons Adriaensen Didn't think of that, here's the current list: dcron espeakup gmerlin-avdecoder i2c-tools iksemel isomaster libmatio libtlen libtxc_dxtn libxml-perl lua-sql-mysql lua-sql-postgres lua-sql-sqlite mget multipath-tools ndisc6 nvclock pam-krb5 perl-text-wrapi18n pidgin-musictracker python2-gasp python2-pypdf ttf-envy-code-r udunits vim-nerdcommenter vim-timestamp winefish I also checked that none of these packages are makedepends of any of the [community] packages. @Gaetan Bisson:
Please send such messages to arch-dev-public in the future: adopting packages are dev's and TU's decision, and not all read arch-general.
I also think non-devs and non-TUs may have valuable insights for why for instance a package should be considered to be too important to not be moved to unsupported. The ibus and lxdm packages were considered to be too important to move to unsupported during the last cleanup. Perhaps someone (the upstream developers?) may have a reason or opinion for why one of the listed packages should not be moved. The decision would still be in the hands of devs and TUs, but there could still be potentially useful information coming from "the outside".
45.8 degrees beg to differ.
Point taken, and suggestions for a better name are welcome. How about "New Year Cleanup"? -- Sincerely, Alexander Rødseth xyproto / TU