2007/12/12, James Rayner <iphitus@gmail.com>:
On Wed, December 12, 2007 16:28, Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Nov 9, 2007 8:38 PM, James Rayner <iphitus@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, November 10, 2007 12:29, Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Nov 9, 2007 6:45 PM, James Rayner <iphitus@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, November 10, 2007 10:11, James Rayner wrote:
http://src.iphitus.org/netcfg-release/initscripts-netcfg2.diff Removes netcfg2 from the current initscripts.
missed something in rc.conf, use this patch instead. http://src.iphitus.org/netcfg-release/initscripts-netcfg2-2.diff
Would it be possible to get this in git-format-patch syntax? This way we maintain your authorship and description of the diff in one nice little package.
I can apply it as is, if that's a problem - but git-format-patch is soo much cooler. Take a look at Dan's "pacman workflow" on toofishes.net if you want a rundown.
done. http://src.iphitus.org/netcfg-release/0001-Removing-netcfg-from-initscripts....
I think it might be better to depends rather than merge. It'd probably be easer to maintain them separately.
I'm way behind here. This is merged on my local working branch (code.phraktured.net). I'm going to pull in a few more initscripts patches, then push to master and release a new package.
That package will depend on netcfg
one kinda catch I just realised. netcfg2 depends on wireless_tools, wpa_supplicant -- so effectively that'd be making them a dep of initscripts. Some won't like that.
I definetely won't like that. Can't we script our rc.sysinit so it won't call netcfg2 if it's not found? And make it optional dependency of initscripts. -- Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич)