4 Dec
2015
4 Dec
'15
5:20 p.m.
Hi On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 9:07 AM, Rashif Ray Rahman <schiv@archlinux.org> wrote:
If there are no objections, I'll go ahead and push 3.x, which should co-exist fine with 2.x. I suppose it's OK to break our naming convention in cases like these.
Why to break it? Just push new opencv and opencv-2 to staging and create a TODO to rebuild all the dependencies.