On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 10:43 -0400, Paul Mattal wrote:
Jan de Groot wrote:
Thanks for not using checkpkg to check that the soname bumped from .so.7 to .so.8. We need to rebuild all packages that link to libflac. This should have gone to testing, and you would have known if you had used checkpkg.
I did use checkpkg. This is how I noticed this, and why I sent this email.
It sounds like you expected I would do something different. If so, we should put that in a document somewhere so that we can all know what to do. If such a document exists, please point me to it.
My excuse for the commotion, seems I checked up with flac 1.1.3 instead of 1.1.4 (we had a bump from 1.1.3 to 1.1.4 AFAIK). Both 1.1.4 and 1.2.0 have the same soname which we link to (only libFLAC.so.8 is interesting, libFLAC.so.8.896986 isn't), so this time there's no need for rebuilds if the flac people did their versioning right.