2008/1/30, Dan McGee <dpmcgee@gmail.com>:
On Jan 30, 2008 3:59 AM, Roman Kyrylych <roman.kyrylych@gmail.com> wrote:
2008/1/30, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com>:
These two have been bumped because apparently some people still had problems due to an edge case with the generation of pacnew files I bumped both the package and the md5sum on profile in order to get around edge cases with no pacnew files
bash was a version bump too mainly to move the man pages
filesystem changes: Setup for FHS compliant man pages - FS#8839 Claim ownership of /etc/profile from bash - FS#4766 Remove LESSCHARSET env var from /etc/profile - FS#8877
bash changes: Update patch level to 033 Remove /etc/profile from package. Move bashisms to /etc/profile.bash - FS#4766
/etc/profile was also largely revamped. Please comment on the changes there if you'd like.
I'd like to get these into core as soon as possible
http://archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/2008-January/016696.html Should we consider /etc/issue not being in backup array as a bug? Or this file should be added to NoUpgrade by user?
I see no reason why this should be backed up. There is nothing there for the user to modify in a normal situation, and I guess 99% of users would want it overwritten. Seems like a good NoUpgrade candidate to me.
Sounds reasonable. Bash works, profiles work, language settings are restored correctly after reset&relogin (==profile.d works). Signed off (i686). -- Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич)