On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 6:41 AM, Paul Mattal <paul@mattal.com> wrote:
Eduardo Romero wrote:
Hi,
Some users would think we should keep wine 1.0.x on extra since it is the stable version. Some users would disagree as many bugs will never be fixed in the stable 1.0.x tree and many features will not be added neither. I have suggestions:
1) wine 1.0.x in extra and wine-devel 1.1.0 and beyond which will provide and conflict with wine, as well in extra. 2) Latest wine version always in extra, as this is an evolutionary package, and people like to have the latest version of it. 3) wine 1.0.x in extra and wine-devel 1.1.0 and beyond in unstable.
Please, add your suggestions, but I would like 1 or 2 to become the solution, I really don't like 3, since wine isn't unstable, just ever changing and adding features.
I would support whatever decision you decide here, Eduardo. I'm generally in favor of having a stable package in extra, but it might not make sense in this case.
I'd go with whatever you think makes most sense, and switch later if you find it's not working.
I'll side with Paul on this issue. I like "stable" versions, but at the same time, I figure you know best - go with your gut on this one