16 Oct
2012
16 Oct
'12
1:29 a.m.
[2012-10-16 10:50:30 +1100] Gaetan Bisson:
[2012-10-15 20:48:46 +0200] Thomas Bächler:
Am 15.10.2012 20:12, schrieb Daniel Wallace:
Makes sense. I'll add it to the 'base' group.
Not needed as netcfg already depends on it.
netcfg isn't in base either
As I pointed out recently, it should be.
Possibly, but regardless of what we end up doing with netcfg, iproute2 should be in base in its own right.
I just saw you removed wpa_supplicant from the base group too... So if I understand your position correctly you are against individual network connectivity tools being in base, but CLI/GUI using them are fine?!? I mean, why not, but I thought base was supposed to be minimal. -- Gaetan