On Nov 4, 2007 7:43 AM, Thomas Bächler <thomas@archlinux.org> wrote:
Daniel Isenmann schrieb:
Just opening a branch that CAN be merged later despite the concerns of others isn't right. I know, you can delete this branch, if it isn't merged later, but I think we are a team and have discuss and decide several things together.
So, you suggest we should post one patch after the other to the list, making the review a pain in the ass. Adding a branch is just a convenient way to collect the work that has been done and show results to others, so they can actually view what is being suggested (which I assume most of you haven't done).
Daniel- I suggest you read up on GIT before you blow Thomas away with invalid accusations. Branches aren't a big deal in GIT, so calm down. Creating a branch doesn't mean anything is getting done anywhere else. Creating a branch is not a "team" decision at all- that is just retarded and would prevent any progress at all on anything we do. NOT creating a branch would be the stupid thing to do here- people get unmotivated to ever submit patches like this again if they just end up in the black hole of politics and bickering. -Dan