Le 10 février 2011 02:51:26, Gaetan Bisson a écrit :
[2011-02-09 11:23:53 -0500] Stéphane Gaudreault:
4) A compact version of vim
Since it is both maintained upstream and featureful, it seems like the most reasonable choice to me. And I personally think that the few additional 100KB compared to other vi's is worth it.
I received a couple of emails from users that wanted to express their preference for a vim-based vi.
* May need a duplicate PKGBUILD as vim is in [extra] while vi is in [core]
Would you still name that package "vi" and prevent it from conflicting with the vim of [extra]? Or something like "vim-tiny" that would conflict and provide vim?
I do not have a strong opinion on this, but the first choice (name that package "vi" and prevent it from conflicting with the vim of [extra]) is probably simpler as the new vim-based vi will be a drop-in replacement of the old vi pkg. Stéphane