25 Mar
2014
25 Mar
'14
1:02 a.m.
[2014-03-25 00:55:51 +0100] Sébastien Luttringer:
On 24/03/2014 23:50, Dave Reisner wrote:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 11:35:36PM +0100, Sébastien Luttringer wrote: Does 2013 cover the whole year? Four full months. More details in listing this page[1]
Is there any use keeping packages older than, say, a year? That'd take 200 GB of disk space. Would you have an estimate of the average monthly bandwidth usage? Personally, although I think the AUR is a valuable service and that you shouldn't be assuming its costs and maintenance alone, I'm not sure if making it official would be a good thing (TM) in terms of encouraging users to downgrade packages rather than reporting bugs and upgrading cleanly when things break. -- Gaetan