Re: [arch-dev-public] boost rebuild

On Wednesday 08 July 2009 05:18:50 K. Piche wrote:

That was me. I've tested a good number of the packages and most don't require a rebuild which is odd since in the past it was always a hassle. smc only required a rebuild cause the boost versioned dep had a '=' and not '>='. I'll finish this up.

Just remove those packages from the list that don't need a rebuild.

Also I think we should drop bmpx if no one has objections. Doesn't work well and hasn't been updated in more than a year.

Sure, why not. This would also include bmp-musepack and bmp-wma which was not rebuild since 2005. -- Pierre Schmitz, http://users.archlinux.de/~pierre