20 Aug
2014
20 Aug
'14
10:26 a.m.
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 07:46:27PM -0700, Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 7:42 PM, Gaetan Bisson <bisson@archlinux.org> wrote:
- vim-minimal: identical to the current vim package
The description probably should be changed to "identical to the previous vim package"
Other than that, I like all of your suggestions.
to avoid confusion, maybe you should add the vim-runtime is the same as before? - vim-runtime: untouched -- Ike