Roman Kyrylych wrote:
2007/4/2, Tom K <tom@archlinux.org>:
Andreas Radke wrote:
Am Mon, 2 Apr 2007 15:24:20 +0300 schrieb "Roman Kyrylych" <roman.kyrylych@gmail.com>:
Just one addition: IMO xfmedia should be moved from community to extra, same for xfburn (there's xfburn-svn only though). +1 to move those 2 packages even in this early state.
Andy
_______________________________________________ arch-dev-public mailing list arch-dev-public@archlinux.org http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-dev-public
xfmedia, maybe - although it is described as "beta-quality, and likely has bugs" on its own website. I maintained it for a while in community, and it never felt particularly solid. xfburn? I see no reason why this should go in extra, when its own devs don't even consider it stable enough to release at all.
I'd put them both in unstable myself.
Hm, what about squeeze then? Is it stable? (just asking)
Re the original question, I'd suggest you ask on tur-users if any TU wants to maintain it in Community. If not, we can move it to Unsupported for anyone to pick up there. Community would be preferable, of course, but IMO it wouldn't be a bad result at all if an enthusiastic AUR user maintained the PKGBUILDs in Unsupported, possibly accompanied by an unofficial repo for the compiled packages. After all, that's how Shadowhand started it off in the first place. T.