7 Aug
2014
7 Aug
'14
8:11 a.m.
On Wed, 06 Aug 2014 22:33:30 +1000 Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org> wrote:
As an aside... why name the package libreoffice-still and not just keep libreoffice? As a user I would expect "pacman -S libreoffice" to find some form of libreoffice.
Allan
I can't really give a good answer, as I'm for keeping plain "libreoffice" too. Another possibility is "libreoffice" virtual package provided by both -still and -fresh, but I'll abstain before Andy returns. -- Bartłomiej Piotrowski http://bpiotrowski.pl/