19 Mar
2012
19 Mar
'12
12:09 p.m.
Am 19.03.2012 12:02, schrieb Tom Gundersen:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Gaetan Bisson <bisson@archlinux.org> wrote:
[2012-03-19 10:40:58 +0200] Ionut Biru:
did any of you actually asked upstream about this? :D
I did this morning:
http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-devel/2012-March/026641.html
Let's see what happens...
For those not subscribed, this was the answer: http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-devel/2012-March/026643.html
So essentially, we should use 2.0, but you always need a gpg-agent with 2.0, which will break on headless systems.