On Nov 28, 2007 7:07 PM, Dan McGee <dpmcgee@gmail.com> wrote:
On Nov 28, 2007 5:14 PM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
On Nov 28, 2007 5:04 PM, Pierre Schmitz <pierre@archlinux.de> wrote:
Am Dienstag, 27. November 2007 22:25:03 schrieb Damir Perisa:
hi devs,
qtiplot 0.9 is now in testing and cannot be backported to work. (0.8.9 needs old qt>=3 but has also quite some problems for building)
therefore the only actually working qtiplot is now in testing. it depends on qt>=4 and pyqt>=4 (and newest qwt and qwtplot3d)
details here: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/6673
so i'm wondering if there is some news or a schedule of the release of new qt pkgs now in testing. what needs to be tested/rebuild so that we can move qt and all other pkgs related to it to extra?
for me everything qt4 related works so far for me (x86_64).
- D
The qt stuff is quite stable imho. The only showstopper I see atm is pacman itself. It still has the problem that it does not update the dependencies of allready installed packages. Afaik this will only be solved by pacman 3.1.
Could you point me to a bug report here? I'm not sure I remember this one
This is the whole requiredby issue- qt will be left with all the what should be qt3 deps because of basically a package name change, I believe.
Yeah, Xavier got to me first - this is a requiredby issue, which is totally removed in 3.1, yay.