16 Mar
2011
16 Mar
'11
6:46 p.m.
Multiple signoffs per architecture would be great, as well as any observations dealing with the upgrade process. Release notes: http://projects.archlinux.org/pacman.git/tree/NEWS @Everyone for FYI, Allan for suggestions: 13:39 < bash`> error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files) 13:39 < bash`> pacman: /usr/bin/pactree exists in filesystem 13:39 < bash`> for example :P 13:39 < bash`> pacman-contrib conflicts 13:39 < toofishes> yeah 13:39 < toofishes> just rm that file for now and continue...good catch Anything we can do here to make this suck less? Unless on -S vs -U it gets pulled into the transaction so things won't conflict, but we'd have to rebuild it at the same time and get it in [community-testing], right? -Dan