2 May
2010
2 May
'10
4:47 p.m.
On 03/05/10 02:20, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
On Mon, 03 May 2010 02:16:44 +1000, Allan McRae<allan@archlinux.org> wrote:
That brings back the whole initial rsync hell we are trying to avoid by not moving everything to the packages directory.
Yes, as I wrote in my other mail. This would be a solution to another problem: separating the "arch" and community repo. My proposed layout has its advantages but the transition is really ugly.
If we are prepared to accept an ugly transition (and a several day rsync), then I like the layout that you propose.