On 2017-11-06 12:16, Eli Schwartz wrote:
Well, I doubt they wanted to be caught by surprise and have nothing ready if we decided not to allow support requests for arch32...
But if we are willing to allow arch32 to be hosted under our umbrella, the presence of separate infrastructure should not IMHO cause us to go back on that and therefore cause additional fragmentation that we were initially okay with avoiding.
There is no umbrella as long as "archlinux.org" domain is not involved. I'm not proposing sharing our master mirror from which every server syncs packages from, but additional spare boxes that are in the areas of the world where in general we had few mirrors. (Re-)using our bug tracker is different subject than is unrelated for now. Let's move away from flyspray before we start being an umbrella. Bartłomiej