Tuesday 08 January 2008, Tobias Powalowski wrote: | On Tuesday 08 January 2008 21:30:17 Damir Perisa wrote: | > Tuesday 08 January 2008, Varun Acharya wrote: | > | I just thought I'll get the ball rolling on the inevitable | > | confusion to follow :) | > | > kde4 depends on qt4 and this is waiting for pacman 3.1 | > | > the only place it can go now is testing. | > | > after we process our stack, i would suggest to put it in | > unstable with kde*4 naming... and once it gets mature enough, we | > can switch the names. | > | > - D | | hi hi :) | First it needs a usable state and this is not the fact right now. | and kde 4.0 series will never get a usable state it's frozen and | will not get new features anytime, 4.1 is scheduled in half a year | or 9 months then it's worth to think about a road to go with | conflicts and such things not before that. i agree. i'm only suggesting that this kde4-devel (svn snaps) pkgs can be put in unstable, as a place to put -devel things that someone wants to try. this way we do not need an extra repo for them. (the whole thing is reallly only a detail) - D -- .·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´ ° ° ° ° ° ° ><((((º> ° ° ° ° ° <º)))>< <º)))><