6 Feb
2013
6 Feb
'13
2:47 a.m.
On 06/02/13 12:45, Allan McRae wrote:
On 06/02/13 12:41, Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
My opinion on the vi symlink is that we should just patch the packages which hardcode vi instead of adding the symlink. If it turns out to be too messy, and there is a general consensus on adding a symlink, I would be more than happy to oblige.
I am highly against patching for this.
I should point out, this means at least half the packages that would require adjustment will not be changed. Allan