On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 10:38 AM, Thomas Bächler<thomas@archlinux.org> wrote:
Aaron Griffin schrieb:
I read through this, and was a little bit hesitant on this functionality.
But then I gave in. Something about it feels weird to me, but if we just get it in there, it can be improved incrementally.
What exactly feels weird? It's the best solution I could come up with that a) doesn't add any new stuff (like new directories, files, concepts, we just use functions.d) b) works when multiple packages want to plug into the same hook
Oh no, I agree. It's a good implementation of the concept. We've been slinging this one around for some time. Still, my Spidey Sense is tingling a bit. I *think* it might be due to the free-form names, but I'm not sure. Like I said, if I figure it out later, we can always tweak things