On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 10:54 PM, Andreas Radke <a.radke@arcor.de> wrote:
Am Fri, 9 Jan 2009 16:33:56 -0500 schrieb "Eric Bélanger" <snowmaniscool@gmail.com>:
BTW, it has a makedepends on
tcl. We should keep tcl in extra as several other package in core have makedepends on packages from extra.
That's something I really dislike. I try to keep my chroots clean wherever possible.
The Integrity Check tool can detect all repo hierarchy problems. Since I ran it on core/extra, it detected all the core -> extra makedependencies : http://archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2009-January/009692.html core/iputils depends on extra/opensp core/iputils depends on extra/libxslt core/iputils depends on extra/docbook-xsl core/madwifi-utils depends on extra/sharutils core/e2fsprogs depends on extra/bc core/ca-certificates depends on extra/ruby core/madwifi depends on extra/sharutils And the extra -> community makedependencies appear as missing since community was not considered : xosd --> 'xmms' flac --> 'xmms' gnome-speech --> 'espeak' I would like to know if that goal of having clean chroots is shared and if it's worth opening tasks on the bug tracker for these problems, or if it is a lost cause :)