+1 here as well. I don't test i686 either and I already have a few packages (emulation related) that are x86_64 only, either because they won't build on i686 without some fixes, or because upstream flat out dropped support for it. Cheers, December 13, 2016 10:31 AM, "Allan McRae" <allan@archlinux.org> wrote:
On 13/12/16 19:20, Bartłomiej Piotrowski wrote:
On 2016-12-12 22:02, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
I'm in favor of an auto build solution, since this has multiple bonusses. We could extend the auto build solution for reproducible builds (yay!). Auto rebuilds and maybe later when vendors get their act togehter (aarch64 *cough*).
Creating a new or adapting existing solutions is time consuming. We struggle to finish and switch to VCS-agnostic dbscripts for a long time and I wouldn't expect that any automated build server will take less time, not to mention security concerns expressed in previous discussions. On the opposite, dropping support is effortless.
Given we can't get databases signed, I can't ever see an autobuild system working.
A
-- Maxime