On 12/05/10 18:31, Thomas Bächler wrote:
Am 12.05.2010 09:46, schrieb Allan McRae:
Honestly, if I wanted comments about gcc and busybox, the subject of this email would have been something like "busybox build issues with gcc-4.5". And then I would have scolded myself for not using the bug tracker.
Can I just have comments on the proposed CFLAGS?
Okay, then you'll get a comment on that: Our toolchain is terribly broken as it is, let's break it further by adding more flags.
Terribly broken? 17% of our repo has been rebuilt since it moved to [core] and 1 package has been reported broken due to gcc. That is 0.07% of packages and even that has a workaround. How terrible... So, do I really have to wait until that is fixed before we can discuss _future_ changes? Allan