24 Jun
2012
24 Jun
'12
10:23 p.m.
On 06/24/2012 11:10 PM, Ronald van Haren wrote:
I'd like to move 2.00 to [core] via [testing] when it is released, letting the grub-bios (atm grub2-bios) replace the old grub package. Adding an install message and a news item is probably a good idea at the time.
Do not replace grub. Most users won't read the pacman output and the configuration syntax was changed, resulting in a non booting system.
Let them move to grub-bios.
Well sure, but grub-bios will be part of the grub group. Won't it automatically replace the grub package with the group in that case?
Ronald
I don't believe that pacman replaces a package with a group. Do we really need a group called grub? What's the use case for that? -- Ionuț