On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Rashif Ray Rahman <schiv@archlinux.org>wrote:
Going by what we have done so far I'd support simply pushing a python3 default gvim package and a split gvim-python2. By convention, that _is_ the "right" answer. Otherwise, no objections, so +1.
I guess providing a gvim with python3 support and gvim-python2 replacing older versions of gvim would work. One of the problems why I think we should remain with gvim as python2 is it would provide no confusion for existing users of gvim. On the other hand if we enable python3 for gvim, we would probably have to make a news announcment about it. Also a major plugin that I know of that doesn't support python 3 yet is youcompleteme for vim [0] which we would probably have to include in the announcement. I'm open to your idea though. Anyone else have any thoughts about Ray's suggestion? [0] - https://github.com/Valloric/YouCompleteMe/issues/587