[arch-dev-public] [signoff] initscripts 2009.08-1
I just released initscripts with all current changes from git, especially because of http://projects.archlinux.org/?p=initscripts.git;a=commitdiff;h=634397e1c7fa... I didn't add Dan's install.sh->Makefile patch for now, as I want to change a few things first: 1) Move minilogd to its own git repository, tarball and package. 2) Make initscripts a -any package. Any objections here?
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 17:33, Thomas Bächler<thomas@archlinux.org> wrote:
I just released initscripts with all current changes from git, especially because of http://projects.archlinux.org/?p=initscripts.git;a=commitdiff;h=634397e1c7fa...
Signed off (x86_64).
I didn't add Dan's install.sh->Makefile patch for now, as I want to change a few things first:
1) Move minilogd to its own git repository, tarball and package. 2) Make initscripts a -any package.
Any objections here?
I'm fine with that. initscripts as -any package is logical. -- Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич)
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Roman Kyrylych<roman.kyrylych@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 17:33, Thomas Bächler<thomas@archlinux.org> wrote:
I just released initscripts with all current changes from git, especially because of http://projects.archlinux.org/?p=initscripts.git;a=commitdiff;h=634397e1c7fa...
Signed off (x86_64).
Another signoff for x86_64, real hardware. No issues with udev or date/time setting.
I didn't add Dan's install.sh->Makefile patch for now, as I want to change a few things first:
1) Move minilogd to its own git repository, tarball and package. 2) Make initscripts a -any package.
Any objections here?
I'm fine with that. initscripts as -any package is logical.
No objection if you are going to maintain it; just seems a bit overkill for what is only a 40KB package. -Dan
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 9:33 AM, Thomas Bächler<thomas@archlinux.org> wrote:
I just released initscripts with all current changes from git, especially because of http://projects.archlinux.org/?p=initscripts.git;a=commitdiff;h=634397e1c7fa...
I didn't add Dan's install.sh->Makefile patch for now, as I want to change a few things first:
1) Move minilogd to its own git repository, tarball and package. 2) Make initscripts a -any package.
Any objections here?
Sounds like overkill to me. How about rewriting minilogd in bash? :)
-------- Original-Nachricht --------
Datum: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 16:33:20 +0200 Von: "Thomas Bächler" <thomas@archlinux.org> An: Public mailing list for ArchLinux development <arch-dev-public@archlinux.org> Betreff: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] initscripts 2009.08-1
I just released initscripts with all current changes from git, especially because of http://projects.archlinux.org/?p=initscripts.git;a=commitdiff;h=634397e1c7fa...
I didn't add Dan's install.sh->Makefile patch for now, as I want to change a few things first:
1) Move minilogd to its own git repository, tarball and package. 2) Make initscripts a -any package.
Any objections here?
Signoff i686. Runs without errors. About: 1) do whatever you think its best 2) initscript is just bash, so I think there is no objection here Cheers, Daniel -- GRATIS für alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT! Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01
On Sat, 2009-08-22 at 16:33 +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote:
I just released initscripts with all current changes from git, especially because of http://projects.archlinux.org/?p=initscripts.git;a=commitdiff;h=634397e1c7fa...
I didn't add Dan's install.sh->Makefile patch for now, as I want to change a few things first:
1) Move minilogd to its own git repository, tarball and package. 2) Make initscripts a -any package.
Any objections here?
Signoff, both architectures.
participants (6)
-
Aaron Griffin
-
Dan McGee
-
Daniel Isenmann
-
Jan de Groot
-
Roman Kyrylych
-
Thomas Bächler