Am Montag 02 August 2010 schrieb Dieter Plaetinck:
> On Mon, 2 Aug 2010
16:27:44 +0200
> 
> Tobias Powalowski  wrote:
> > Hi guys,
>
> added nilfs2 patches from upstream
> > and also added a fix for cfdisk
> >
partition changer from upstream.
> > please signoff both
> > arches
> > 
> >
greetings
> > tpowa
> 
> Do I understand it correctly that you took the
latest release (2.18)
> and then applied some patches on top of it?  Isn't
this against our
> patching policy?
> 
> (don't shoot me. just asking ;)
>

> Dieter
- cfdisk is broken in current tools and the patch fixes this.
-
nilfs2 is new and only affects people who use nilfs2, 
  now you get correct
udev entries and blkid can handle everything

greetings
tpowa 
-- 
Tobias
Powalowski
Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer
(tpowa)
http://www.archlinux.org
tpowa@archlinux.org

Am 02.08.2010 16:39, schrieb Dieter Plaetinck:

...

On Mon, 2 Aug 2010 16:27:44 +0200

Tobias Powalowski wrote:

...

...

Hi guys, added nilfs2

...

...

and also added a fix for cfdisk partition changer from upstream. please signoff both arches

greetings

...

tpowa

Do I understand it correctly that you took the latest release (2.18) and then applied some patches on top of it? Isn't

Am Montag 02 August 2010 schrieb Thomas Bächler: patches from upstream this against our

...

patching policy?

We apply patches from the upstream repository all the time. These are not just random patches found on some stupid mailing list, but patches that are queued for the next official util-linux-ng release (at least I hope so, judging from Tobias' mail). Yes everything is from upstream git repository.

greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tpowa@archlinux.org

On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 17:27, Tobias Powalowski wrote:

...

Hi guys, added nilfs2 patches from upstream and also added a fix for cfdisk

Am Montag 02 August 2010 schrieb Roman Kyrylych: partition changer from upstream.

...

please signoff both arches

I didn't try to partition anything with cfdisk, but it does show information correctly, and no other issues in the package noticed, so I guess it's safe to sign off x86_64. signoff anyone else?

-- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tpowa@archlinux.org

Am Samstag 07 August 2010 schrieb Thomas Bächler:

Am 06.08.2010 20:19, schrieb Tobias Powalowski:

...

safe to sign off x86_64. signoff anyone else?

Signoff 64. anyone 686?

-- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tpowa@archlinux.org