[arch-dev-public] Most up-to-date distro
jesus, Debian is in the top ten. Dusty 2009/7/20 Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com>:
Guess who it is? http://oswatershed.org/
-- Ask me about custom python and web development services.
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Dusty Phillips<buchuki@gmail.com> wrote:
jesus, Debian is in the top ten.
Dusty
2009/7/20 Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com>:
Guess who it is? http://oswatershed.org/
Not too surprising. :) On a "toot our horn" note, it is great to see that even with the number of out-of-date packages we seemingly always have, we truly are way ahead of the curve as far as getting this stuff packaged, and maybe even more importantly, working out some of the kinks for every other distro by sending things upstream. -Dan
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 23:18, Aaron Griffin<aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
Guess who it is? http://oswatershed.org/
Interesting. Can enyone explain me what "Future Distros" list means? I guess it's something like unstable branches, but Arch has RRS, so why it has different numbers there? -- Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич)
Roman Kyrylych wrote:
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 23:18, Aaron Griffin<aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
Guess who it is? http://oswatershed.org/
Interesting. Can enyone explain me what "Future Distros" list means? I guess it's something like unstable branches, but Arch has RRS, so why it has different numbers there?
From what I understand it looks at developmental branches. So for us, it would include testing. So I find it quite strange that Arch gets worse on the measures of out-dated packages and lag. Allan
participants (5)
-
Aaron Griffin
-
Allan McRae
-
Dan McGee
-
Dusty Phillips
-
Roman Kyrylych