[arch-dev-public] [signoff] automake 1.10.1-1
in testing for both architectures. please signoff. please test it carefully. -Andy ChangeLog: New in 1.10.1: - Automake development is done in a git repository on Savannah now, see http://git.sv.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=automake.git A read-only CVS mirror is provided at cvs -d :pserver:anonymous@pserver.git.sv.gnu.org:/automake.git \ checkout -d automake HEAD - "make dist" can now create lzma-compressed tarballs. - `automake --add-missing' will by default install the GPLv3 file as COPYING if it is missing. Note that Automake will never overwrite an existing COPYING file, even when the `--force-missing' option is used. Further note that Automake 1.10.1 is still licensed under GPLv2+. - Libtool generic flags are now passed to the install and uninstall modes as well. - Files with extension .sx are also treated as preprocessed assembler. - install-sh now has an BSD-like option `-C' to preserve modification times of unchanged files upon installation. Bugs fixed in 1.10.1: * Long standing bugs: - Fix aix dependency tracking for libtool objects. - The signal handling of aclocal has been improved. - Targets beginning with a digit are now recognized correctly. - All directories `.libs'/`_libs' used by libtool are cleaned now, not only those in which libraries are built. * Bugs introduced by 1.10: - Fix output of dummy dependency files in presence of post-processed Makefile.in's again, but also cope with long lines. - $(EXEEXT) is automatically appended to filenames of XFAIL_TESTS that have been declared as programs in the same Makefile. This is for consistency with the analogous change to TESTS in 1.10. - The autoconf version check implemented by aclocal in aclocal.m4 (and new in Automake 1.10) is degraded to a warning. This helps in the common case where the Autoconf versions used are compatible. - Fix order of standard includes to again be `-I. -I$(srcdir)', followed by directories containing config headers.
On Jan 27, 2008 4:41 PM, Andreas Radke <a.radke@arcor.de> wrote:
in testing for both architectures. please signoff. please test it carefully.
No signoff from me until you get the group right- you changed it from base-devel to base somehow. Besides the packaging issue, I didn't notice any problems. -Dan
Am Sun, 27 Jan 2008 17:07:21 -0600 schrieb "Dan McGee" <dpmcgee@gmail.com>:
No signoff from me until you get the group right- you changed it from base-devel to base somehow.
Besides the packaging issue, I didn't notice any problems.
-Dan
thanks. my fault. it's fixed in -2. took the old one from base category. i wonder why it wasn't removed. cvs up -dP should remove it from base. Andy
On Jan 27, 2008 5:46 PM, Andreas Radke <a.radke@arcor.de> wrote:
Am Sun, 27 Jan 2008 17:07:21 -0600 schrieb "Dan McGee" <dpmcgee@gmail.com>:
No signoff from me until you get the group right- you changed it from base-devel to base somehow.
Besides the packaging issue, I didn't notice any problems.
-Dan
thanks. my fault. it's fixed in -2. took the old one from base category. i wonder why it wasn't removed. cvs up -dP should remove it from base.
Looks good now, signing off i686. -Dan
On Sun, 27 Jan 2008, Dan McGee wrote:
On Jan 27, 2008 5:46 PM, Andreas Radke <a.radke@arcor.de> wrote:
Am Sun, 27 Jan 2008 17:07:21 -0600 schrieb "Dan McGee" <dpmcgee@gmail.com>:
No signoff from me until you get the group right- you changed it from base-devel to base somehow.
Besides the packaging issue, I didn't notice any problems.
-Dan
thanks. my fault. it's fixed in -2. took the old one from base category. i wonder why it wasn't removed. cvs up -dP should remove it from base.
Looks good now, signing off i686.
-Dan
signing off both arches -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
participants (3)
-
Andreas Radke
-
Dan McGee
-
Eric Belanger