[arch-dev-public] procinfo version?
Hi, Does anyone know about procinfo's version? Our package has it as version 19, when the source file is procinfo-18.tar.gz and all the files inside say version 18. Is this a typo? Allan
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 6:15 AM, Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org> wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone know about procinfo's version? Our package has it as version 19, when the source file is procinfo-18.tar.gz and all the files inside say version 18. Is this a typo?
Allan
No idea, the patch name use 19 too. Maybe we should switch to procinfo-ng: http://sourceforge.net/projects/procinfo-ng/ if someone wants to do the work. Eric
On 18/04/10 23:20, Eric Bélanger wrote:
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 6:15 AM, Allan McRae<allan@archlinux.org> wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone know about procinfo's version? Our package has it as version 19, when the source file is procinfo-18.tar.gz and all the files inside say version 18. Is this a typo?
No idea, the patch name use 19 too. Maybe we should switch to procinfo-ng: http://sourceforge.net/projects/procinfo-ng/ if someone wants to do the work.
Sure... is it actually better, or just want to be better? What do other distros use? If it looks like this is a good replacement, I will do the packaging. Allan
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org> wrote:
On 18/04/10 23:20, Eric Bélanger wrote:
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 6:15 AM, Allan McRae<allan@archlinux.org> wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone know about procinfo's version? Our package has it as version 19, when the source file is procinfo-18.tar.gz and all the files inside say version 18. Is this a typo?
No idea, the patch name use 19 too. Maybe we should switch to procinfo-ng: http://sourceforge.net/projects/procinfo-ng/ if someone wants to do the work.
Sure... is it actually better, or just want to be better?
No idea. That's what I meant by "doing the work". Someone will need to check if it's better and do the replacement if so. What do other
distros use?
Debian is using it for their testing and unstable release.
If it looks like this is a good replacement, I will do the packaging.
Allan
On 19/04/10 11:53, Eric Bélanger wrote:
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Allan McRae<allan@archlinux.org> wrote:
On 18/04/10 23:20, Eric Bélanger wrote:
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 6:15 AM, Allan McRae<allan@archlinux.org> wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone know about procinfo's version? Our package has it as version 19, when the source file is procinfo-18.tar.gz and all the files inside say version 18. Is this a typo?
No idea, the patch name use 19 too. Maybe we should switch to procinfo-ng: http://sourceforge.net/projects/procinfo-ng/ if someone wants to do the work.
Sure... is it actually better, or just want to be better?
No idea. That's what I meant by "doing the work". Someone will need to check if it's better and do the replacement if so.
What do other
distros use?
Debian is using it for their testing and unstable release.
I had just looked Debian up and saw that. That is evidence enough for me that the -ng version is the way to go. Allan
participants (2)
-
Allan McRae
-
Eric Bélanger