[arch-dev-public] [signoff] nano 2.2.1-1
minor upstream bump. please signoff. note: since 2.2.0 nano failed to open PKGBUILDs for me. after removing old /etc/nanorc and replacing it with the new one it works again. -Andy 2009.12.12 - GNU nano 2.2.1 "DLR strikes back" is open for business. This release fixes many bugs, including: missing keybindings for page up/down and GotoDir in the browser, ^P/^N in the help menu, and restoration of M-W as the default re-search binding. Other fixes include several issues with compiler warnings and configure options, and documentation updates, including the nano texinfo manual, nano and nanorc man pages, and UPGRADE file, and some missing syntax highliting entries for the saple nanorc. And no release would be complete without the latest round of 'final' soft wrapping fixes! Finally, nano will no longer print a warning when attempting to insert the contents of a read-only file into an existing buffer. Enjoy and Happy Hanukkah.
On 12/22/2009 12:09 AM, Andreas Radke wrote:
minor upstream bump. please signoff.
note: since 2.2.0 nano failed to open PKGBUILDs for me. after removing old /etc/nanorc and replacing it with the new one it works again.
-Andy
2009.12.12 - GNU nano 2.2.1 "DLR strikes back" is open for business. This release fixes many bugs, including: missing keybindings for page up/down and GotoDir in the browser, ^P/^N in the help menu, and restoration of M-W as the default re-search binding. Other fixes include several issues with compiler warnings and configure options, and documentation updates, including the nano texinfo manual, nano and nanorc man pages, and UPGRADE file, and some missing syntax highliting entries for the saple nanorc. And no release would be complete without the latest round of 'final' soft wrapping fixes! Finally, nano will no longer print a warning when attempting to insert the contents of a read-only file into an existing buffer. Enjoy and Happy Hanukkah.
signoff x86_64 -- Ionut
Am Sat, 26 Dec 2009 12:44:34 +0200 schrieb Ionut Biru <biru.ionut@gmail.com>:
signoff x86_64
Anyone for i686?
participants (2)
-
Andreas Radke
-
Ionut Biru