2008/2/26, Dan McGee :

On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 9:04 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote:

...

In addition to a version bump, I changed the simple_firewall.rules file to a more generic and correct configuration.

Please sign off.

Seems to be OK here. Signoff i686.

same here. -- Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич)

On Thu, 28 Feb 2008, Thomas Bächler wrote:

Roman Kyrylych schrieb:

...

2008/2/26, Dan McGee :

...

On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 9:04 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote:

...

In addition to a version bump, I changed the simple_firewall.rules file to a more generic and correct configuration.

Please sign off.

Seems to be OK here. Signoff i686.

same here.

anyone for x86_64?

Man pages are not FSH compliant. No signoff from me. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.

2008/2/29, Thomas Bächler :

Thomas Bächler schrieb:

...

In addition to a version bump, I changed the simple_firewall.rules file to a more generic and correct configuration.

Please sign off.

The only difference to the -1 version is that the manpage path is now FHS-compliant (/usr/share/man). Please sign off.

Signed off (i686). -- Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич)

On Fri, 29 Feb 2008, Dan McGee wrote:

On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 4:06 PM, Roman Kyrylych wrote:

...

2008/2/29, Thomas Bächler :

...

Thomas Bächler schrieb:

...

In addition to a version bump, I changed the simple_firewall.rules file to a more generic and correct configuration.

Please sign off.

The only difference to the -1 version is that the manpage path is now FHS-compliant (/usr/share/man). Please sign off.

Signed off (i686). Signoff i686.

signing off for x86_64 -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.