Hi,
it's been talked about it a bit. Jason said he is using ssmtp and he is willing to maintain it in extra. I was using msmtp but with mutt's new build in smtp (for those who havn't heard it b4, yes you heard right: mutt build in and smtp in one sentence) I don't use msmtp anymore. I don't say msmtp is a bad program. I just think we should ship maybe only one forwarder in extra and I'm fine with ssmtp. Anyone using nbsmtp at all?
-Tobbi
On Dec 29, 2007 7:15 PM, Tobias Kieslich tobias@justdreams.de wrote:
I don't use msmtp anymore.
Same, i dropped it for mutt's support. Still, it was easier to setup than the others so I'll maintain it if someone wants...
On Nov 26, 2007 7:58 PM, Aaron Griffin aaronmgriffin@gmail.com wrote:
On Dec 29, 2007 7:15 PM, Tobias Kieslich tobias@justdreams.de wrote:
I don't use msmtp anymore.
Same, i dropped it for mutt's support. Still, it was easier to setup than the others so I'll maintain it if someone wants...
I'm one of the few who doesn't use a command line email client (gasp!), so I use msmtp for outgoing emails because it is super easy to set up. If no one else, I'd take it.
nbsmtp? I'd vote to get rid of it just because I didn't know it existed.
-Dan
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 09:39:33PM -0600, Dan McGee wrote:
On Nov 26, 2007 7:58 PM, Aaron Griffin aaronmgriffin@gmail.com wrote:
On Dec 29, 2007 7:15 PM, Tobias Kieslich tobias@justdreams.de wrote:
I don't use msmtp anymore.
Same, i dropped it for mutt's support. Still, it was easier to setup than the others so I'll maintain it if someone wants...
I'm one of the few who doesn't use a command line email client (gasp!), so I use msmtp for outgoing emails because it is super easy to set up. If no one else, I'd take it.
nbsmtp? I'd vote to get rid of it just because I didn't know it existed.
ha, my thought exactly :)
-S
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007, Dan McGee wrote:
On Nov 26, 2007 7:58 PM, Aaron Griffin aaronmgriffin@gmail.com wrote:
On Dec 29, 2007 7:15 PM, Tobias Kieslich tobias@justdreams.de wrote:
I don't use msmtp anymore.
Same, i dropped it for mutt's support. Still, it was easier to setup than the others so I'll maintain it if someone wants...
I'm one of the few who doesn't use a command line email client (gasp!), so I use msmtp for outgoing emails because it is super easy to set up. If no one else, I'd take it.
I think the same about msmtp, it is REALLY easy to set up. Since I never used ssmtp I don't know how it compares. I just think one forwarder would be enough. But I'm fine with two as well, and I can keep maintaining msmtp. I was just saying we can throw it out if no one needs it. -T
nbsmtp? I'd vote to get rid of it just because I didn't know it existed.
yepp, I would throw it out, too
On Nov 27, 2007 4:53 PM, Jason Chu jason@archlinux.org wrote:
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 05:15:56PM -0800, Tobias Kieslich wrote: <<<<
Hail Tobias from the future!
What can you tell us of your travels? How was Christmas? And Boxing Day?
This is that Canadian holiday where you guys wear boxing gloves and punch each other, right?
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007, Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Nov 27, 2007 4:53 PM, Jason Chu jason@archlinux.org wrote:
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 05:15:56PM -0800, Tobias Kieslich wrote: <<<<
Hail Tobias from the future!
What can you tell us of your travels? How was Christmas? And Boxing Day?
This is that Canadian holiday where you guys wear boxing gloves and punch each other, right?
Yeah, that's what I'm doing right now, punching Jason. Oh, no, wait! I am too busy doging ... ouch ... uh
arch-dev-public mailing list arch-dev-public@archlinux.org http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-dev-public
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 05:15:56PM -0800, Tobias Kieslich wrote:
Hi,
it's been talked about it a bit. Jason said he is using ssmtp and he is willing to maintain it in extra. I was using msmtp but with mutt's new build in smtp (for those who havn't heard it b4, yes you heard right: mutt build in and smtp in one sentence) I don't use msmtp anymore. I don't say msmtp is a bad program. I just think we should ship maybe only one forwarder in extra and I'm fine with ssmtp. Anyone using nbsmtp at all?
Hmmm you know I was wondering why this thread was out of order in my mail reader... then I realized you sent it tomorrow.
You might want to check your clock ;)
-S
On Nov 28, 2007 3:30 PM, Simo Leone simo@archlinux.org wrote:
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 05:15:56PM -0800, Tobias Kieslich wrote:
Hi,
it's been talked about it a bit. Jason said he is using ssmtp and heis willing to maintain it in extra. I was using msmtp but with mutt's new build in smtp (for those who havn't heard it b4, yes you heard right: mutt build in and smtp in one sentence) I don't use msmtp anymore. I don't say msmtp is a bad program. I just think we should ship maybe only one forwarder in extra and I'm fine with ssmtp. Anyone using nbsmtp at all?
Hmmm you know I was wondering why this thread was out of order in my mail reader... then I realized you sent it tomorrow.
Back on topic, thanks.
I say we keep msmtp and ssmtp, and remove nbsmtp - any problems with that? i will gladly maintain msmtp if no one wants it.
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 03:35:01PM -0600, Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Nov 28, 2007 3:30 PM, Simo Leone simo@archlinux.org wrote:
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 05:15:56PM -0800, Tobias Kieslich wrote:
Hi,
it's been talked about it a bit. Jason said he is using ssmtp and heis willing to maintain it in extra. I was using msmtp but with mutt's new build in smtp (for those who havn't heard it b4, yes you heard right: mutt build in and smtp in one sentence) I don't use msmtp anymore. I don't say msmtp is a bad program. I just think we should ship maybe only one forwarder in extra and I'm fine with ssmtp. Anyone using nbsmtp at all?
Hmmm you know I was wondering why this thread was out of order in my mail reader... then I realized you sent it tomorrow.
Back on topic, thanks.
I say we keep msmtp and ssmtp, and remove nbsmtp - any problems with that? i will gladly maintain msmtp if no one wants it.
Whoops... now I feel dumb... I just realized that I use msmtp and not ssmtp.
At this point I don't really care what happens with ssmtp.
Jason
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Jason Chu wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 03:35:01PM -0600, Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Nov 28, 2007 3:30 PM, Simo Leone simo@archlinux.org wrote:
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 05:15:56PM -0800, Tobias Kieslich wrote:
Hi,
it's been talked about it a bit. Jason said he is using ssmtp and heis willing to maintain it in extra. I was using msmtp but with mutt's new build in smtp (for those who havn't heard it b4, yes you heard right: mutt build in and smtp in one sentence) I don't use msmtp anymore. I don't say msmtp is a bad program. I just think we should ship maybe only one forwarder in extra and I'm fine with ssmtp. Anyone using nbsmtp at all?
Hmmm you know I was wondering why this thread was out of order in my mail reader... then I realized you sent it tomorrow.
Back on topic, thanks.
I say we keep msmtp and ssmtp, and remove nbsmtp - any problems with that? i will gladly maintain msmtp if no one wants it.
Whoops... now I feel dumb... I just realized that I use msmtp and not ssmtp.
At this point I don't really care what happens with ssmtp.
So I vote for getting rid of ssmtp and nbsmtp. Objections? Oh and I can keep maintaining it. It was never really a hassle...
-T
2007/11/29, Tobias Kieslich tobias@justdreams.de:
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Jason Chu wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 03:35:01PM -0600, Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Nov 28, 2007 3:30 PM, Simo Leone simo@archlinux.org wrote:
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 05:15:56PM -0800, Tobias Kieslich wrote:
Hi,
it's been talked about it a bit. Jason said he is using ssmtp and heis willing to maintain it in extra. I was using msmtp but with mutt's new build in smtp (for those who havn't heard it b4, yes you heard right: mutt build in and smtp in one sentence) I don't use msmtp anymore. I don't say msmtp is a bad program. I just think we should ship maybe only one forwarder in extra and I'm fine with ssmtp. Anyone using nbsmtp at all?
Hmmm you know I was wondering why this thread was out of order in my mail reader... then I realized you sent it tomorrow.
Back on topic, thanks.
I say we keep msmtp and ssmtp, and remove nbsmtp - any problems with that? i will gladly maintain msmtp if no one wants it.
Whoops... now I feel dumb... I just realized that I use msmtp and not ssmtp.
At this point I don't really care what happens with ssmtp.
So I vote for getting rid of ssmtp and nbsmtp. Objections? Oh and I can keep maintaining it. It was never really a hassle...
+1 for keeping only msmtp.
arch-dev-public@lists.archlinux.org