Re: [arch-dev-public] [arch-commits] CVS update of core/base/glibc (11 files)
On 10/29/07, andyrtr@archlinux.org
Date: Monday, October 29, 2007 @ 17:26:29 Author: andyrtr Path: /home/cvs-core/core/base/glibc
Added: locale.patch (1.1) weekday.patch (1.1) Modified: PKGBUILD (1.72 -> 1.73) locale.gen (1.4 -> 1.5) Removed: first_weekday.diff (1.3) fix-C-first_weekday.diff (1.1) glibc-2.5-branch_update-2.patch (1.1) glibc-2.6-malloc-fixes.patch (1.1) locales-fr.diff (1.2) locales_GB.diff (1.1) pl_PL-miesiace.patch (1.1)
upgpkg: glibc 2.7-2 update weekday/locale patching to current Debian state; update list of supported locales.gen; clean unneeded patches
---------------------------------+ PKGBUILD | 26 first_weekday.diff | 1948 - fix-C-first_weekday.diff | 27 glibc-2.5-branch_update-2.patch |48089 -------------------------------------- glibc-2.6-malloc-fixes.patch | 952 locale.gen | 809 locale.patch |21965 +++++++++++++++++ locales-fr.diff | 282 locales_GB.diff | 42 pl_PL-miesiace.patch | 33 weekday.patch | 1865 + 11 files changed, 24255 insertions(+), 51783 deletions(-)
The diff is longer than the limit of 39KB.
Can we please run patches through gzip for anything over like 1000 lines? This really kills the people that use abs. -Dan
On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 16:40 -0500, Dan McGee wrote:
The diff is longer than the limit of 39KB.
Can we please run patches through gzip for anything over like 1000 lines? This really kills the people that use abs.
I hate binary files in CVS. They don't belong there, they should go to /other/ on the ftp in that case. Other distributions like Gentoo tar their patches together and keep versioned patchsets for this on HTTP/FTP.
On 10/29/07, Jan de Groot
On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 16:40 -0500, Dan McGee wrote:
The diff is longer than the limit of 39KB.
Can we please run patches through gzip for anything over like 1000 lines? This really kills the people that use abs.
I hate binary files in CVS. They don't belong there, they should go to /other/ on the ftp in that case. Other distributions like Gentoo tar their patches together and keep versioned patchsets for this on HTTP/FTP.
I actually want to put my foot in my mouth here a bit. First, you are right in that they probably belong in some download directory and not CVS. Also, csup and cvs are smart enough to do some compression during sending anyway if you want it to. It would seem smart to have versioned patchsets kept outside of CVS. If anyone wants to work on doing this and implementing it, that would be awesome. -Dan
participants (2)
-
Dan McGee
-
Jan de Groot