[arch-dev-public] core error/conflicts found
Hi while testing the new ISO i found that the ralink fw packages provide the same LICENSE file, im gone the whole day so if someone could fix it would be cool. make is also missing from /devel or packages.txt was again broken, please take a look at it. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tpowa@archlinux.org
Tobias Powalowski wrote:
Hi while testing the new ISO i found that the ralink fw packages provide the same LICENSE file, im gone the whole day so if someone could fix it would be cool.
Ralink license added to licenses package, fw packages amended accordingly. T.
On 9/19/07, Tom K
Tobias Powalowski wrote:
Hi while testing the new ISO i found that the ralink fw packages provide the same LICENSE file, im gone the whole day so if someone could fix it would be cool.
Ralink license added to licenses package, fw packages amended accordingly.
Great, thanks a lot Tom. Now we have the last two problems pending: * make is not in /devel - I believe this is Thomas' ballpark - do you have this just not checked in? * Tobias, you said packages.txt was broken - can you clarify? The permissions are fixed, but it is on a cron job, so it might not be appropriate the exact second you check it.... could you fill me in on the details? Thanks guys, Aaron
Aaron Griffin schrieb:
Now we have the last two problems pending:
* make is not in /devel - I believe this is Thomas' ballpark - do you have this just not checked in?
It is in devel in CVS, but I didn't finish the rebuilds yet (I only did core/base until 'k' (except grub)), didn't start core/devel yet.
On 9/19/07, Aaron Griffin
* Tobias, you said packages.txt was broken - can you clarify? The permissions are fixed, but it is on a cron job, so it might not be appropriate the exact second you check it.... could you fill me in on the details?
Following up here - Tobias, was this ever solved? I think the other two problems are solved now (Thomas put more stuff into devel/).
Hi! I've noticed that some base packages don't have groups=('base') in PKGBUILD on CVS. e.g. http://cvs.archlinux.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/base/openssl/?cvsroot=Core&only_with_tag=CURRENT Is that because a dev who uploaded repackaged tarballs forgot to update CVS? -- Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич)
participants (5)
-
Aaron Griffin
-
Roman Kyrylych
-
Thomas Bächler
-
Tobias Powalowski
-
Tom K