Re: [arch-dev-public] Integrity Check i686: core, extra, community 19-02-2010
I have no problem with removing it, especially considering we've always been fine with makedepends in other repos. PS sent from my phone, sorry if the format blows. I think it's top posting... On Feb 19, 2010 7:14 PM, "Xavier Chantry" <chantry.xavier@gmail.com> wrote: On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 10:00 PM, <repomaint@archlinux.org> wrote:
Repo Hierarchy for Makedepends... Do we want to clutter the output of integrity check every week with makedepends repo hierarchy, which seems to get very little interest and attention (for good reasons) ?
It's a growing list, and it's the most useless section but takes more than half of the total report length. PS : aaron in CC because I think I cannot post to arch-dev-public with that mail :)
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
I have no problem with removing it, especially considering we've always been fine with makedepends in other repos.
Another solution would be to use a whitelist so that the packages with out-of-repo makedepends that we are aware of, and agree upon, won't be listed in the report.
PS sent from my phone, sorry if the format blows. I think it's top posting...
On Feb 19, 2010 7:14 PM, "Xavier Chantry" <chantry.xavier@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 10:00 PM, <repomaint@archlinux.org> wrote:
Repo Hierarchy for Makedepends... Do we want to clutter the output of integrity check every week with makedepends repo hierarchy, which seems to get very little interest and attention (for good reasons) ?
It's a growing list, and it's the most useless section but takes more than half of the total report length.
PS : aaron in CC because I think I cannot post to arch-dev-public with that mail :)
On 21/02/10 01:39, Eric Bélanger wrote:
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Aaron Griffin<aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
I have no problem with removing it, especially considering we've always been fine with makedepends in other repos.
Another solution would be to use a whitelist so that the packages with out-of-repo makedepends that we are aware of, and agree upon, won't be listed in the report.
Or, just exclude [core] -> [extra] ones. [extra] makedepending on stuff in [community] is of most interest as the repos are controlled by different groups. Allan
participants (3)
-
Aaron Griffin
-
Allan McRae
-
Eric Bélanger